LinkedOUT

I’ve worked in industries where technology evolves so rapidly that layoffs are common. Fortunately, I’ve been able to avoid that so far. Continual education is also a norm and survival tool for professionals in my industry due to the fast pace of innovation. I’ve been more focusing on investing in my education and to survive in the industry in the long run. Luckily, i can aford a plan to pursue it.  I’ve saved from my previous employment to support this plan. If you need to verify my education status and my employment performance, i will request them for your reference. 

I worked in the AI/ML field for years. Based on my limited capacity, I have some assessment of where the technology is going and the future landscape of it. even i am not certain where it goes 100%, one thing I can tell you is a stubborn one who doesn't use llm will be left out.   It is highly encouraged to use large language models to proofread emails, even within the larger sophisticated professional settings like JPMC, employees are highly encouraged to use LLM Suite (a model that I proudly helped building) . 

In addition, I’m proud that I’ve been providing tech consulting services to small businesses in cutting-edge areas, particularly speech recognition, where I incorporate large language models and fine-tune them for specific business needs. It’s a growing field, and I feel fortunate to be part of it. This work has helped me maintain my standard of living. I hope this will help me make the transition into a small business owner.

**Fourth Wall Break**

In an email chain responding to property disputes, this was the response. When Cheng Chen doesn't have a response to facts, he responds with lies. In this case, he justifies his abuse of LLM's in writing a self-aggrandizing unprofessional biography. In the original email, he argues that he can use LLM because this is not a graded project. But would you hire him if his experience is to use an LLM worse than any college student? Honestly, the proof is in the pudding. If he trained a model to use his word choices and write like him, I'd be a little more impressed. Frankly, a kid in high school has the ability to train LLM models that sound more convincing than Cheng Chen. This goes to show what an unorganized mind he has. To go from the parking dispute to an unsolicited biography. As someone else who read the email stated "we think it's funny he is 'consulting'. Who would actually understand him?" Further, I can not emphasize, who would trust him if he's writing documents solely with an LLM? No one is against LLMs, but a cheat is a cheat who can not formulate their own words in a coherent manner